<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for evand.org</title>
	<atom:link href="http://evand.org/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://evand.org</link>
	<description>Evan DiBiase's blog</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 25 Jul 2008 01:06:33 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Comment on Apple is Lying about MobileMe by edibiase</title>
		<link>http://evand.org/2008/07/13/applie-is-lying-about-mobileme/#comment-53</link>
		<dc:creator>edibiase</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Jul 2008 01:20:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://evand.org/?p=47#comment-53</guid>
		<description>&lt;b&gt;Steve&lt;/b&gt;, I was right with you up until I saw that knowledge base article. If Apple's having trouble getting push from computers to MobileMe working as they had advertised it, why not say so? I think a responsible business would let their customers know if things weren't functioning as they had intended.

Apple, however, has promised one thing, delivered another, added a knowledge base article indicating that things don't work like they promised, and then silently changed their marketing copy to reflect the new reality.

I hope you're right, and that Apple has some cool update in the works that would allow push to work like they said it would. But I find it really hard to believe that, since all of the evidence seems to point to the contrary.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><b>Steve</b>, I was right with you up until I saw that knowledge base article. If Apple&#8217;s having trouble getting push from computers to MobileMe working as they had advertised it, why not say so? I think a responsible business would let their customers know if things weren&#8217;t functioning as they had intended.</p>
<p>Apple, however, has promised one thing, delivered another, added a knowledge base article indicating that things don&#8217;t work like they promised, and then silently changed their marketing copy to reflect the new reality.</p>
<p>I hope you&#8217;re right, and that Apple has some cool update in the works that would allow push to work like they said it would. But I find it really hard to believe that, since all of the evidence seems to point to the contrary.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Apple is Lying about MobileMe by Steve</title>
		<link>http://evand.org/2008/07/13/applie-is-lying-about-mobileme/#comment-52</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Jul 2008 01:10:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://evand.org/?p=47#comment-52</guid>
		<description>Let's use some common sense...
Does anyone here HONESTLY think that Apple INTENTIONALLY LIED to you about the capabilities of MobileMe? Has it ever occurred to you that what you are asking is immediate PERFECTION of a system that involves millions of people, and millions of pieces of man-made equipment and hundreds of thousands of lines of code, which Apple makes work to 95-98% of everyone's expectation on a daily basis? Does it not seem that if Apple INTENTIONALLY LIED about its intentions that that might be just a little BAD for BUSINESS in the long run, and that maybe they understand that--being a responsible and very thriving business and all?

My point here is that we have no patience anymore. This is the age of instant gratification. Why must we be so inpatient with our understanding as businesses work out issues? I have never seen so many people stressed out because things did not work perfectly the first day. Take a chill pill and have a beer. It will get fixed. Just remember I told you so...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Let&#8217;s use some common sense&#8230;<br />
Does anyone here HONESTLY think that Apple INTENTIONALLY LIED to you about the capabilities of MobileMe? Has it ever occurred to you that what you are asking is immediate PERFECTION of a system that involves millions of people, and millions of pieces of man-made equipment and hundreds of thousands of lines of code, which Apple makes work to 95-98% of everyone&#8217;s expectation on a daily basis? Does it not seem that if Apple INTENTIONALLY LIED about its intentions that that might be just a little BAD for BUSINESS in the long run, and that maybe they understand that&#8211;being a responsible and very thriving business and all?</p>
<p>My point here is that we have no patience anymore. This is the age of instant gratification. Why must we be so inpatient with our understanding as businesses work out issues? I have never seen so many people stressed out because things did not work perfectly the first day. Take a chill pill and have a beer. It will get fixed. Just remember I told you so&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Apple is Lying about MobileMe by edibiase</title>
		<link>http://evand.org/2008/07/13/applie-is-lying-about-mobileme/#comment-51</link>
		<dc:creator>edibiase</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Jul 2008 12:35:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://evand.org/?p=47#comment-51</guid>
		<description>&lt;b&gt;kenfegore&lt;/b&gt;, I don't disagree with you that 15 minutes is reasonable. It's just not what they had initially advertised, and it's significantly less good in some cases.

So it's not unbearable, and I'm not going to cancel my subscription over it. I just wish that Apple had either been honest initially about what MobileMe could do or implemented what they had promised.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><b>kenfegore</b>, I don&#8217;t disagree with you that 15 minutes is reasonable. It&#8217;s just not what they had initially advertised, and it&#8217;s significantly less good in some cases.</p>
<p>So it&#8217;s not unbearable, and I&#8217;m not going to cancel my subscription over it. I just wish that Apple had either been honest initially about what MobileMe could do or implemented what they had promised.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Apple is Lying about MobileMe by kenfegore</title>
		<link>http://evand.org/2008/07/13/applie-is-lying-about-mobileme/#comment-50</link>
		<dc:creator>kenfegore</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Jul 2008 12:33:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://evand.org/?p=47#comment-50</guid>
		<description>I must say, 15 minutes seems pretty reasonable to me as long as the frequency is known and reliable.

However, if you feel that this time differential is unbearable to you, have you contacted Apple about it and asked them whether there is a reason for that delay? Or have you asked for your money back if you feel you do not receive a service worthy of your subscription?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I must say, 15 minutes seems pretty reasonable to me as long as the frequency is known and reliable.</p>
<p>However, if you feel that this time differential is unbearable to you, have you contacted Apple about it and asked them whether there is a reason for that delay? Or have you asked for your money back if you feel you do not receive a service worthy of your subscription?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Apple is Lying about MobileMe by edibiase</title>
		<link>http://evand.org/2008/07/13/applie-is-lying-about-mobileme/#comment-49</link>
		<dc:creator>edibiase</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Jul 2008 02:37:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://evand.org/?p=47#comment-49</guid>
		<description>To &lt;b&gt;cak&lt;/b&gt; and &lt;b&gt;Steve&lt;/b&gt;, in particular: I'm not complaining that I have an inherent right to instantaneous synchronization. I'm complaining that Apple is not selling what they're advertising; they claim to be selling a solution that syncs between your phone, MobileMe's web apps, and your computer "automatically, instantly, and continuously," but actually a deliver a solution that syncs those things "once every 15 minutes," which, in my book, is neither instant nor continuous.

Furthermore, I'm not just frustrated because Apple is falsely advertising MobileMe's features; I'm frustrated because this feature, in particular, is one that I really would like to have. I'm often in situations where I need to update a contact or event moments before putting my laptop to sleep, and may not remember to manually sync before shutting the lid. MobileMe, as advertised, would mean that I'd never lose information this way; as implemented, however, MobileMe fails me in this scenario.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>To <b>cak</b> and <b>Steve</b>, in particular: I&#8217;m not complaining that I have an inherent right to instantaneous synchronization. I&#8217;m complaining that Apple is not selling what they&#8217;re advertising; they claim to be selling a solution that syncs between your phone, MobileMe&#8217;s web apps, and your computer &#8220;automatically, instantly, and continuously,&#8221; but actually a deliver a solution that syncs those things &#8220;once every 15 minutes,&#8221; which, in my book, is neither instant nor continuous.</p>
<p>Furthermore, I&#8217;m not just frustrated because Apple is falsely advertising MobileMe&#8217;s features; I&#8217;m frustrated because this feature, in particular, is one that I really would like to have. I&#8217;m often in situations where I need to update a contact or event moments before putting my laptop to sleep, and may not remember to manually sync before shutting the lid. MobileMe, as advertised, would mean that I&#8217;d never lose information this way; as implemented, however, MobileMe fails me in this scenario.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Apple is Lying about MobileMe by Bill</title>
		<link>http://evand.org/2008/07/13/applie-is-lying-about-mobileme/#comment-48</link>
		<dc:creator>Bill</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Jul 2008 02:09:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://evand.org/?p=47#comment-48</guid>
		<description>Apple fans may also recall the length of time that it took to get movie previews in Front Row to work as promised in Steve Jobs' presentation of the 2006 iMac.

However, after beefing up their servers, it worked basically as promised about three months later.

Perhaps MobileMe will work as promised when Apple has time to ramp up to meet demand.

I think that this is becoming standard practice in various industries. For example, cell phone service is sold like crazy in a new market, but capacity is not built in until enough contracts have been sold to justify the expense.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Apple fans may also recall the length of time that it took to get movie previews in Front Row to work as promised in Steve Jobs&#8217; presentation of the 2006 iMac.</p>
<p>However, after beefing up their servers, it worked basically as promised about three months later.</p>
<p>Perhaps MobileMe will work as promised when Apple has time to ramp up to meet demand.</p>
<p>I think that this is becoming standard practice in various industries. For example, cell phone service is sold like crazy in a new market, but capacity is not built in until enough contracts have been sold to justify the expense.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Apple is Lying about MobileMe by Steve</title>
		<link>http://evand.org/2008/07/13/applie-is-lying-about-mobileme/#comment-47</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Jul 2008 01:59:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://evand.org/?p=47#comment-47</guid>
		<description>Waaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaahhhhhhhhhhhhh! I can't get instant gratification! WWWaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaahhhhhhhhhhhhhhh! I have to wait 15 minutes. WWWWWaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaahhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh! Would someone change my diaper please, RIGHT NOW!!!!!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Waaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaahhhhhhhhhhhhh! I can&#8217;t get instant gratification! WWWaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaahhhhhhhhhhhhhhh! I have to wait 15 minutes. WWWWWaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaahhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh! Would someone change my diaper please, RIGHT NOW!!!!!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Apple is Lying about MobileMe by elle</title>
		<link>http://evand.org/2008/07/13/applie-is-lying-about-mobileme/#comment-46</link>
		<dc:creator>elle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Jul 2008 01:34:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://evand.org/?p=47#comment-46</guid>
		<description>"It would mean that your iphone would be polling mobile me far too much that the battery would run out a LOT quicker."

&lt;a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Push_technology" rel="nofollow"&gt;Push technology&lt;/a&gt; means the iPhone never polls anything for MobileMe data. The iPhone could never leave standby and still receive Pushed data.

Push means MobileMe polls the iPhone when there's an update, and only when there's an update, and sends the data if the iPhone responds. It's the same concept as receiving calls — the iPhone isn't always actively seeking out incoming phone calls. It waits for the cell tower to transmit the call.

The fact that MobileMe isn't true Push technology is another one of those "Well why the hell not?" moments, up there with MMS and video recording. Though, with this one, I'm eying AT&#38;T as the cause. They're not RIM; they're not built for, and may not want to foot, the network stress of true Push technology.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;It would mean that your iphone would be polling mobile me far too much that the battery would run out a LOT quicker.&#8221;</p>
<p><a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Push_technology" rel="nofollow">Push technology</a> means the iPhone never polls anything for MobileMe data. The iPhone could never leave standby and still receive Pushed data.</p>
<p>Push means MobileMe polls the iPhone when there&#8217;s an update, and only when there&#8217;s an update, and sends the data if the iPhone responds. It&#8217;s the same concept as receiving calls — the iPhone isn&#8217;t always actively seeking out incoming phone calls. It waits for the cell tower to transmit the call.</p>
<p>The fact that MobileMe isn&#8217;t true Push technology is another one of those &#8220;Well why the hell not?&#8221; moments, up there with MMS and video recording. Though, with this one, I&#8217;m eying AT&amp;T as the cause. They&#8217;re not RIM; they&#8217;re not built for, and may not want to foot, the network stress of true Push technology.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Apple is Lying about MobileMe by Cari</title>
		<link>http://evand.org/2008/07/13/applie-is-lying-about-mobileme/#comment-41</link>
		<dc:creator>Cari</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 13 Jul 2008 21:17:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://evand.org/?p=47#comment-41</guid>
		<description>Laaaammmmeee.   Especially the part about how it updates only "every hour" in OS X 10.4.11.  Apple has enough money to do better; they would have a lot more enthusiastic fans if they would spend more time and money on making their customers happy.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Laaaammmmeee.   Especially the part about how it updates only &#8220;every hour&#8221; in OS X 10.4.11.  Apple has enough money to do better; they would have a lot more enthusiastic fans if they would spend more time and money on making their customers happy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Apple is Lying about MobileMe by cak</title>
		<link>http://evand.org/2008/07/13/applie-is-lying-about-mobileme/#comment-40</link>
		<dc:creator>cak</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 13 Jul 2008 20:51:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://evand.org/?p=47#comment-40</guid>
		<description>Yes, 15 minutes (max) is TOO long to wait, how dare they! Seriously, it is difficult to see this taking a shorter amount of time than 15 minutes. It would mean that your iphone would be polling mobile me far too much that the battery would run out a LOT quicker.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes, 15 minutes (max) is TOO long to wait, how dare they! Seriously, it is difficult to see this taking a shorter amount of time than 15 minutes. It would mean that your iphone would be polling mobile me far too much that the battery would run out a LOT quicker.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
